Happy New Year

Finally...

Just finished the new blog settings. I like this set-up much better. I felt cramped with the previous one. Any comments or suggestions?

More Innerbelt Bridge News

Last weeks PLanning Commision meeting needed to be over at noon in order to make room for flu shot distribution. So there was one person who wanted to speak that was never heard. That person was Ed Hauser. He did speak with Chairman Tony Coyne for a little bit afterwords, but I am not sure to what extent. It is this reason that I am republishing his statement and handout that should have been part of the public record, but probably was not included.

From NeoBridge.net:

Preliminary Assessment Findings - Request for ODOT to Reconsider the Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge Alternative for the Southern Bridge Alignment

December 21, 2005
To: Gordon Proctor
Director, Ohio Department of Transportation
1980 W. Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43223


From: Ed Hauser
11125 Lake Avenue #402
Cleveland, OH 44102

Distribution List:

Interested Citizens, Organizations, Public Officials, and the Media
U.S. Senators: George Voinovich, Mike DeWine
U.S. Representatives: Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Dennis Kucinich
FHWA Ohio Office: Herman Rodrigo, Director-Program Development; Dennis Decker, Division Administrator;
 Victoria Peters, Director- Office of Engineering & Operations
Governor of Ohio- Robert Taft
Ohio Senators: Representing Greater Cleveland Districts
Ohio Representatives: Representing Greater Cleveland Districts
ODOT District 12: David Coyle, Deputy Director; Craig Hebebrand, Innerbelt Plan Project Manager
Ohio Lake Erie Commission: Members
Ohio Historic Preservation Office- Franco Ruffini, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
Cuyahoga County Commissioners: Tim Hagan, President; Jimmy Dimora, Peter Lawson Jones
Cuyahoga County Planning Commission: Members
Mayor of Cleveland- Jane Campbell
Mayor Elect of Cleveland- Frank Jackson
Cleveland City Council: Members
Cleveland City Planning Commission: Members

Dear Director Proctor:

As a citizen, I have participated in ODOT's Cleveland Innerbelt Plan from the first meeting in 2001 through last week's meeting at the Cleveland City Planning Commission. I will share my findings in this preliminary assessment that focuses on the Innerbelt Bridge Alternatives. The overall finding is that ODOT must reconsider the Southern Bridge Alignment Alternative for the reasons brought forth below. At this time, there is insufficient information available to the public and inadequate explanations why the Southern Bridge Alignment Alternative was removed from further consideration.

Please respond to this request in five business days and add this preliminary assessment request to the public record under "public comments." I will submit a separate public records request (FOIA) to ODOT's public information officer regarding the public records for the Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge Alternatives.

Overview of Findings

The county planning commission submitted an alternative plan for a southern bridge alignment in March 2003 that was removed from further consideration by ODOT in June 2005. The only reason the South Bridge plan was removed can be found in the minutes of the Urban Core Projects Advisory Committee on June 9, 2005- “Paul Dorothy added that the Southern Alignment for the bridge has been removed from further consideration because it would require taking the Greek Orthodox Church of the Annunciation on the south end of the bridge.”

However, it seems that there was an alternative that wouldn't take the church, as mentioned in those minutes, “Paul Alsenas said at the last Committee meeting, a Southern Alternative was shown that allowed the church to remain.” Also, during the last three public meetings, ODOT acknowledged that the Southern Bridge plan is “feasible.”

The question remains- Why was the South Bridge plan removed from further consideration? ODOT still has to provide us a timely and logical answer to that question, before choosing the final bridge alignment. Without a clear answer to that question, public records need to be inspected to find the answer.

ODOT is Proceeding Without Full Consideration of All Public Comments Being Gathered

Up to now, there has been an overwhelming public response for ODOT to reconsider southern bridge alignment plan. It seems that public input does not enter into the equation when ODOT decides how a half-billion dollars of our tax money is spent for the new Innerbelt Bridge. ODOT stated that they will not reconsider the southern bridge alignment although they admit the plan is feasible.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't ODOT using public money for both the Innerbelt Bridge project and for their salaries? Why did ODOT hire consultants to design a half-billion dollar bridge that does not have public consensus? As the old saying goes, “don't bite the hand that feeds you,” meaning that public servants work for the public and must listen to what we tell them! At this time ODOT has no intention to reconsider the Southern Bridge Alignment Plan.

ODOT has already selected the bridge design team for its “recommended” northern bridge alignment plan. That means the taxpayers are paying a bridge design team without ODOT addressing the public comments from the last round of public meetings and the comments that will be submitted through the end of January. The main question here is- Will ODOT will correct its official Transportation Development Process? If ODOT corrects its process, the best alternative for the bridge alignment will emerge.

Top Ten Reasons Why ODOT Must Reconsider the Southern Bridge Alignment Plan:

10. ODOT's removal of the South Bridge plan is invalid because Greek Orthodox Church can remain. ODOT must clearly explain why the Southern Bridge Alignment Alternative was removed from further consideration, after acknowledging that the plan is feasible.

9.Public comments gathered so far, support the South Bridge plan. Public comments submitted to ODOT for the Innerbelt Plan must be posted on its website.

8.ODOT has hired the bridge designers prior to compiling and addressing all public comments gathered through the deadline in January.

7.U.S. Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Planning Commission and most importantly the public supports an independent review for the South Bridge plan.

6.No cost analysis for the South Bridge span, which is hundreds of feet shorter than the North Bridge. The only cost analysis has been for the North Bridge alignments.

5.No economic impact study for the North or South Bridge plans. Economic Impact Studies for both the Northern and Southern Bridge Alignment Alternatives must be completed and assessed prior to the final decision of the alignment. There are differences between the Northern and Southern Bridge Alignments regarding the amount and location of prime land that would be opened up.

4.No engineering analysis for the South Bridge plan. There are differences between the Northern and Southern Bridge Alignments in the approaches to the Central Interchange and the ramp closures.

3.The Historic Preservation Act requires that all alternatives be examined prior to demolishing a structures or property eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. ODOT's “Recommended Preferred Alternative” for the North Bridge takes property eligible for the NRHP. The Innerbelt Bridge is also within the boundary of the Ohio Coastal Management Program, therefore the bridge development must be consistent with OCMP policies.

2.Step 6 (current step) of ODOT's Transportation Development Process states “The decision to carry forward more than one alternative is permissible. If more than one alternative is reasonable and there are no major difference in the level of potential impacts among the alternative, then all of those alternatives should be carried forward through the evaluations in this step."

1.ODOT must Reconsider the South Bridge Plan to cultivate public trust and confidence in ODOT. The implementation of ODOT's "Transportation Development Process" is flawed and needs to be corrected immediately, to fulfill its requirement for a "balanced consideration of alternatives and impacts." It is clear, for the reasons stated above, that certain requirements and obligations in ODOT's official process have not been met.

Conclusion

Step 6 is very critical in the determination of what bridge alignment we will have live with for the next 50-100 years. It will also have a tremendous impact on the economic development opportunities and attractiveness of our great community.

At this time, ODOT is recommending that we proceed with its preferred alternative that will repair the existing Innerbelt bridge for eastbound traffic and build a new bridge to the north. ODOT's Recommended Preferred Alternative has many flaws associated with it and there is an urgent need for the Southern Bridge Alignment Alternative to “be carried forward through the evaluations in this step.”

Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________
Ed Hauser

Great use of a parking Space

Heidi, urban affairs student from Kansas City, found this post of what do with a metered parking space. I'll go one step further and say this would be a good idea for the spaces in front of fire hydrants. I, for one, am sick of seeing vehicles (usually 'official' vehicles) parked in these spaces.
Do you have an idea for a parking space? This may be usefull for next year's iNGENUiTY.

from the "i love this so much" files

Via Pednet, a great idea for putting parking meters to good use: turn the parking spots into parks!

Feeding the meter of a parking space enables one to rent precious downtown real estate, typically on a 1/2 hour to 2 hour basis. What is the range of possible occupancy activities for this short-term lease?

PARK(ing) is an investigation into reprogramming a typical unit of private vehicular space by leasing a metered parking spot for public recreational activity.

We identified a site in an area of downtown San Francisco that is underserved by public outdoor space and is in an ideal, sunny location between the hours of noon and 2 p.m. There we installed a small, temporary public park that provided nature, seating, and shade.

Our goal was to transform a parking spot into a PARK(ing) space, thereby temporarily expanding the public realm and improving the quality of urban human habitat, at least until the meter ran out.

The comments on BLDGBLOG provided even more suggestions for the rented spaces, but my favorite was: "Two or three consecutive spots and you could go bowling."

City Councilman Unearths Magical Zoning Amulet

I love this. Actually my wife found it and sent it to me. It is from August; I am surprised I have not seen it before.

From The Onion:

City Councilman Unearths Magical Zoning Amulet

August 24, 2005 | Issue 41•34

ROCHESTER, NY—After years spent poring over mysterious and arcane plat sheets and deciphering long-forgotten building codes, city councilmember Mike LaMere unearthed the mysterious City Zoning Amulet Friday.

Mike LaMere, wearing the Ever-Evaluating Eye of Surr-Vey.

"Behold!" LaMere said, holding aloft the solid-gold amulet, which is emblazoned with the Ever-Evaluating Eye of Surr-Vey, Lord Of Demarcation, He Who Measures And Assesses. "With this sigil, the power of zoning comes. Through me, the power of zoning flows! All will behold my power, and I shall bow to no man when designating matter-of-right developments for major retail and office spaces to a maximum lot occupancy of 75 percent for residential use!"

LaMere held the glowing amulet aloft and transmuted a neighborhood of low-income apartments into a semi-wooded, single-family, residential district with an adjoining riverside park.

Though the amulet had long been dismissed as urban legend, a mythical ideal of zoning perfection handed down from city planner to city planner, LaMere became convinced that not only was it real, but that it had been used to lay out the cities of Ur, Atlantis, and Inver Grove Heights, MN.

LaMere credited the amulet with the overnight renovation of the Monroe County Public Library, and the recent redesignation of a Southern Rochester area from "commercial" to "single-family residential use for detached and semi-detached structures." Many Rochester citizens believe the amulet is responsible for the fully stocked ocean aquarium that materialized in the city center Sunday, and the gleaming new Friendly's restaurant that rose serenely over the banks of the Genesee River late Monday afternoon.

Although the Rochester City Zoning Board controls all decisions related to city planning, sources at City Hall say that, as long as LaMere's powerful zoning wizardry is performed for the good of the city, they "see no reason to deny him what seems to be his destiny."

LaMere unleashes the Eye of Surr-Vey's power, violently rezoning a residential area into a landfill.

"Two weeks ago, the biggest news in Rochester was our huge public garage sale," said William A. Johnson, Rochester's mayor. "Our city center was still a moribund tax burden with small businesses in big buildings and families moving to the suburbs in droves. Now, with a wave of his mighty amulet, Councilman LaMere can designate matter-of-right medium-density development, with limited offices for non-profit organizations, trade associations, and professionals permitted as a special exception requiring approval of the RCZA."

Despite the potential improvements to Rochester's civic landscape, some residents remain wary of LaMere's apparent bureaucratic invincibility.

"It's wonderful that someone's finally doing something to revitalize this town, even if it is someone who can commune with church gargoyles," said local baker Wendy Kittner, whose business was mystically placed on the National Register Of Historic Places last week despite being housed in a building erected in 1981. "He frightens me, and my concern is that if I defy him, I may be turned to stone."

City planning commissioner Errol Criclow, who was dismissed by LaMere at a Planning And Zoning Commission hearing last Thursday as "subhuman," said that he feared that LaMere's power would eventually corrupt him and his city. According to Criclow, during a private consultation with local community leaders, LaMere became infuriated with timid suggestions that his amulet be used to create more green spaces. In a blinding torrent of thunder and light, LaMere violently rezoned Rochester's west side with a maze of warehouses and parking garages. The act left LaMere himself dazed and shaken.

"For a minute there, he seemed his old self," said Criclow. "When he saw what he'd done, he looked remorseful. But then his hand found the amulet, and he threw back his head and laughed long and loud, like a man who has forgotten the difference between industrial and recreational—between right and wrong."

Added Criclow: "I don't think what he's doing is mere magic. I think it's darkest bureaucromancy."

Opportunity Cost, or Opportunity Lost

Opportunity Cost (from Wikipedia): the cost of something in terms of an opportunity foregone (and the benefits that could be received from that opportunity), or the most valuable foregone alternative.

No, the birthday was not so crazy that I just recovered. I just needed to take a break from thinking for a little while.

I have something to help fill this space – I am going to start publishing the generalities of what the City Planning Commission has adopted or not adopted. You would think this would be made more public by those who profess to “Believe”; however, I only see the really big things that occasionally appear in local papers by the likes of Breckenridge, Gill and Prendergast. I know there a few others, but that is not the point. There should be news on all of the happenings in the city in regards to what is being developed. (This applies to decisions made by the County Planning Commission as well.) This first attempt of reporting will not be a very detailed one since I really did not decide to start doing this until two days ago and I do not have sufficient notes.

Moving on (in order) –
Zoning:

There were four zoning changes made. The most significant (by significant, I mean the one that will affect people the most) was the creation of the Clark Metro Business Revitalization District. The district encompasses West 25^th Street from I-71 to I-90 and Clark Avenue from Fulton Road to Scranton Avenue. This is a good move by the CDC of the densest places in the city. They will be able to create positive sense of place along this corridor as soon as they do something with the adult establishments near the heart of the district. APPROVED

Design Review:

Park Lane Villa Rehabilitation
This is a vacant building in University Circle and next to the beautiful Judson Manor. Previously this was an apartment building that was eventually converted to over 150 units of senior housing; most of the apartments were efficiency type spaces. The rehabilitated building will have 93 modern apartments and a new 8-unit condominium next to it, as well as a parking garage. The building will use historic tax credits for part of its funding and when complete, will be a nice addition to the area. APPROVED

Star Research Building (conceptual approval)
This new 5-story building will be located on near East 100^th Street and Cedar Avenue. This will be the first new construction on the south side of Cedar in many years. The proposed research center will not be a project of the Cleveland Clinic but may be used by some of the Clinic’s researchers. The building is being designed by Westlake, Reed & Leskowsky. APPROVED

Innerbelt Bridge Presentation
The Director of the Cuyahoga County Planning Commission, Paul Alsenas, gave a presentation on the Innerbelt Bridge Design and Location Alternatives. I believe anybody who is reading this already knows what is on the table, so I will not bother with what was said by Paul. He did add, however, a new element into to the fold – at least new to me. This new concept was the reworking of University Road in Tremont from the barely two lane-lane road it is now into a fully functional road that would allow better access and great views to and of the Towpath Trail.

I want to report more on the comments that were made by those in attendance.

The affected CDC’s mostly said what has already been reported; here are some additional comments made to the Commission.

From the Quadrangle: They have hired there own traffic consultant to further research the potential access losses; It is time for the city to step and take a stand on the issues raised

From Tremont: Concerned about impact on church, West 14^th street and any potential home loss (ed. obviously, very uninformed).

From Gateway: Access is paramount. They think that having land that is more developable will hurt their neighborhood

Comments from the players to the Commission:

Bob Brown: Reported on a letter from Craig Hebebrand – ODOT is in the process of reviewing constructionability and management of traffic with national experts to see if the southern alignment is feasible.

Debbie Berry: Concerned with potential freeway closures and vehicle access to downtown. Wonders if the ‘new’ developable land that would appear if the southern alignment were chosen will actually have to be used for new ramp placement.

Linda Henrichson: Says that closure to traffic is bad. The ramps to city streets will work out if the southern alignment is chosen. Concerned with bike and pedestrian right of ways.

Comments from the Commission:

Curry: ODOT has not shown what will be gotten by each action it takes. This should be about Strategy in addition to safety.

Tom Breckenridge of the PD was present and reported on a portion of what was said by those present; however, I saw him leave early, so he missed some important comments. Scott Carpenter from the soon-to-be-open Fire Department Museum gave a brief and heartfelt comment against the northern alignment, as did friend John McGovern. As I prepared for my own comment, there was at least two other residents who spoke against the northern alignment.

My comment (paraphrased):

Assuming the engineering for the southern alignment proves feasible, the commission and ODOT must realize there are many residents among us who feel a year of potential awkward traffic management due to a freeway closure is worth the wait.
There are numerous ways to connections to downtown from all directions that will work as a temporary traffic solution, including I-490. This may even help bolster GCRTA ridership. This is not about your inconvenience. Stop thinking about it that way and think about how it will affect our children

Coming Soon

OK, finals are over.
I am now going to work on the template.
Then I will return to a regular posting schedule of sorts.
Happy birthday to me.

Adding some 'weight' to the location of the new convention center

I hate when people take an elevator up one floor. I have always wished elevators could be programmed not to go one floor up (with exception for those with physical disabilities). That being said:
Reading this article in the Wall Street Journal,"New Buildings Help People Fight Flab," got me to thinking about the location of the proposed Cleveland Convention Center. Although this article is actually focused on the design of buildings and their walkability, I started thinking of the convenience, or perceived convenience, of each proposed location.
I have struggled with which location would be the best for said center - they both have their pluses and minuses. The riverfront site would help in expanding the convention season that currently ends in October due to the weather. Come in on a plane, take the train to Tower City, check in at a hotel, eat, go to conference, never worry about the weather. It would also encourage people to stay off the streets. How would the businesses on East Fourth or the Warehouse District feel about that?
The current location is surrounded by a civic space that compares to no other city, there is plenty of room to grow and it is close to most of downtown. The not so good side of it would be being exposed to the elements.
Keeping this article in mind, I am putting my vote in for rebuilding on the current site. Call it Cleveland's part in keeping people in shape. Damn the weather - if it is raining, people can run.
I would rather have people walking around downtown.

Cross Posting Comment - BFD: Forest City News

Comment cross posted on Brewed Fresh Daily:

First, the “Quiet Crisis” comment was tongue in cheek – Sorry if you did not get the joke.

Mr. Morrison, the IX Center is not a convention center; it is an exposition center that caters well for the groups that use it: manufacturing exhibiters, recreation vehicle and boat lovers, late winter/early spring amusement park enthusiasts, etc. The IX center does not cater to the typical convention, or corporate meetings. There are some meeting spaces there, nut not the kind the come to the current downtown center. The IX center does not have the infrastructure to maintain the amount, and size of the conventions, conferences and corporate meetings that currently come downtown. (By infrastructure, I mean hotels, restaurants, retail and convenient transportation options. Of course there is the area around Bagley Road in Middleburgh Heights, but that is neither Cleveland or convenient.)

Regarding operating losses – there is currently only one center in the country that has an operating surplus on a regular basis. That is The Moscone Center in San Francisco. Every relatively new convention center in the country usually runs in the red. They are built/rebuilt knowing this will happen. It is not about making a profit – you might say it is about marketing the city to those who would not normally come for a visit. It also about supporting the economy (service and tourism) the city decided to take on as manufacturing diminished as one of our primary economies. If we do not build or rebuild a new center, we will have abandoned the progress we have made.

You want to provide funds for CSU (I would love it since I am a student there), then go to the state – they are responsible for that; or change the state constitution. You want to provide funds for Tri-C, then support future levies – I do.

I am still skeptical about the FCE series, but I will read it with an open mind. Perhaps businesses like FCE would be more active in the city and region if residents were aware of how they did things – and thus more appreciative (i.e., Progressive, MBNA, Standard Oil, the list goes on). I don’t know.

Disclosure time: I am for rebuilding the convention center.
I see the pros and cons of both sites and will leave it to people who are supposedly smarter then I am to make the decision as to where to build.

Forest City news

I received an email today addressed to not only myself, but also to the writers of Full Cleveland and Urban Paradoxes (at least these were the visible addresses). The email came from the John Kroll, Deputy Business Editor of the Plain Dealer. It reads:

The Plain Dealer will begin a five-part series on the transformation of Forest City Enterprises this Sunday, Nov. 27. We thought local blogs that discuss development issues might like to know.

When the series begins, it will go online at
http://www.cleveland.com/forestcity

We've already begun a blog that will track the company's operations, at
http://www.cleveland.com/weblogs/forestcity

John Kroll
Deputy Business Editor
The Plain Dealer

I must say I am humbled to be in league with the other two blogs. I nmy opinion there are more worthy commentatorsout in the sphere then I. That being said - I checked out the blog. There is not much there as of now, but that is a given since this is only the beggining. Here is one of the blurbs from the Forest City blog posted on Tuesday.

Urban Revival: Forest City's Rise
This Sunday, The Plain Dealer launches a five-part series about Cleveland-based real estate developer Forest City Enterprises Inc. The series charts Forest City's transformation from a suburban developer and home-improvement retailer in Greater Cleveland to one of the country's pre-eminent urban redevelopers.

It's a story of remarkable growth that is inextricably linked to the Ratner family that controls the company, and that also highlights Forest City's complex relationship with its hometown.

As an online companion to the series, The Plain Dealer is also launching this blog devoted to Forest City. It will live on long after the series ends, as a central information bank for the company's developments across the country. Forest City has projects percolating from coast to coast, and we'll post major news here, along with links to media stories, blogs and Web sites about the company in other cities. -- CM

A thought before I go to bed dreaming of turkey and snow.
Is the PD putting this five part series under its Quiet Crisis?

I have nothing against Forest City, I actually remeber going to Frest city hardware on Brookpark Road when I was younger.
I do realize that Cleveland has alway had a problem with irking the big boys in town and thia may include them. However, I do wish FCE would concentrate on more things here other then apartments.

night, night

Happy Thanksgiving

Update - Convention Center/Joint Meeting

I almost forgot to follow up on this.
No action was taken by the Planning Commission on this day. There were, in my lowly opinion, two things I did notice worth bringing up:
1 – There are many cost issues not coming forward on Forest City's Riverfront site; mainly the cost of rebuilding and expanding Carter Road, which would be tunneled through the proposed convention center. As well as any cost associated with the adaptive reuse of the current center, which would have to be part of the project – not like the Scranton Road Peninsula housing that was first proposed then killed off the first time Forest City spoke up.
2 – I may be assuming too much here, but it seemed to me that Hunter Morrison’s, Planning Director of Cleveland before his wife became mayor, gave a very moving (we'll call it a speech, but maybe lecture is a better word) talk rationalizing why the commission should choose reconstruction on the current site as opposed to building new on the other, was a little over the top. It was not bad – I enjoyed it. In fact, everyone enjoyed it. For god’s sake, they applauded him afterwards.

What I got out of it was, well - after being involved in the planning scene in Cleveland for the better part of three years, I have never heard Morrison say squat about any project in the city, not publicly anyhow. Fast forward to now - after the election - and now he is vocal. I am just wondering if he has some desire to get back into City Hall. Maybe it was just me... I don't know.

That was the feeling I got out of it. In no way is this a negative feeling. It would be great for the incoming Jackson administration and would probably put to rest any concerns people may have regarding some of the planning that occurred during Campbell’s administration. (Many people say that the recently passed Waterfront Plan was really Morrison’s all along.

Anyway, I am getting top political.
So now we are told the CFA will be deciding on a final site sometime after the New Year, most likely after the elections.

Innerbelt Project and plan for new "Signature Bridge" over the Cuyahoga

I am back from a very busy week of school stuff. My Urban design class project came out very nice.
I proposed some changes for the West Boulevard corridor from Detroit Avenue to the West Boulevard & West 105th Street intersection. If anybody is interested, drop me line and I will send you the pdf.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch...

From the NeoBridge site

Start: 11/22/2005 - 11:30am

End: 11/22/2005 - 1:30pm

REALNEO is hosting our November 22nd NEO Excellence Roundtable at the City Club with the Innerbelt Bridge Plan featured as the discussion topic. We will be joined by Cuyahoga County Planning Commission Director Paul Alsenas, and we have invited representative of the Ohio Department of Transportation. One outcome we hope to see from this process is increased support for developing a new "Signature Bridge" for Northeast Ohio. We invite you to attend and participate in these discussions.

Bring on the Cameras

The cameras are coming!
The cameras are coming!
The cameras are coming!
Finally.
I am glad they are coming.
I don't care how they are rationalized (revenue vs. safety).
I don't care what side of the town they are on either. There should be more.
I hate all you bastards that run lights.
And anybody who has a problem with it should not be driving. Paticularly the person who ran into me the summer of 2004. Stupid idiot. (The only accident I have ever been involved with in my 20+ years of driving.)
To all of you state legislators who are continuing to erode the cities home rule status - if you make it illegal for cities to have them I will do everything possible to make sure you never get elected again. Worry about state issues (funding education).
Here are some lovely pictures of the cameras by my house.

Joint Meeting of the City Planning Commission, the Design Review Committee and the Cleveland Landmarks Commission

From the County Planning Blog:

The Cleveland City Planning Commission has made available an assessment of potential Convention Center sites that compares the River Site, Mall West Block Site, and the Mall Lakefront Site.
The proposals will be discussed at a joint meeting of the City Planning Commission, the Design Review Committee and the Cleveland Landmarks Commission on Friday, November 11, 2005 from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m. in Room 212 of the Cleveland Convention Center. The Convention Facilities Authority will also hold a Combination Planning and Community Consensus Committee Meeting on Tuesday, November 15th at 6:00 p.m. at the I-X Center.

Check out the first link. This is the most data publically displayed (in an electronic form) for a project I have ever seen.
Good job, finally. Although the Landmarks Commission has been doing an admirable job electronically displaying projects they are hearing for a lttle while now.
I'll be there tomorrow and will report.

LeBron James wallscape

Has anybody seen the new wallscape of LeBron James on the western wall of the Tower City? (I think it is the offices of Sherwin Williams - I cannot think of what building it is. It is the northwest corner of Ontario and Huron.)

On February 4 of this year, ARG/MediaPro of Beachwood, Ohio went before the Cleveland Planning Commission with their plans to put up a large image of King James on said wall. The commission was very excited about it and suggested that they make it bigger then what was proposed. One member suggested that the company research the possibility of attaching a giant hoop James is coming out of to the wall in order to make it appear that the picture for the slam. The final result is a little different then what was proposed, but it still came out pretty good.
The pictures are of the wall as it has always looked, the proposed picture and the almost final product.
I think this is a good thing. It does not matter who it is on the wall, any to cover up some of the boring views of the city, especially wall like this one that thousands of people see everyday.
In my opinion, we need more signage downtown. It gives vibrancy to the city. I am not saying every building should advertising on, just enough to create some life.
Last year there were some temporary 'signs' around the city for Reebok. They were just moving images projected on walls from the back of some vans parked in parking lots. That was very cool, and I bet it cost a fraction of what others have to pay for typical signage.

Atlantic Station - what Steel Yard Commons wishes it could be.

Found in Planning Livable Communities:
Atlantic Station open to the public last month and looks to be a huge succes. I think Steelyard Commons would have had much more positive feedback if it were modeled after the Atlanta project. They had the same problem we had - closed steel yard, vacant land - but they have turned it into a much more sustainable project. They have IKEA as a main retail tenent, as opposed to sprawlmart, so that may be a plus for them. The thing is, even if they had a wall-to-wallmart, Atlantic Station is adding a significant amount of housing to the new neighborhood. So, any possible loss to retailers in the surrounding neighborhoods due to loss of pedestrian traffic will be countered by the new residents.
If you look at the picture, you may think it is similar in land size (and shape) as to SYC. In fact, both are to have about 1 million square feet of retail; however, Atl Stn will add about 5,000 units of housing (I know, no low income housing - but many units will be labled 'affordable'), and abot 6 million square feet of office space. Everything will be constructed using smart growth policies.
The Atlantic Journal-Constitution states:

"To support the goal of being a pleasant place to walk, the retail district is laid out in a grid pattern, with wide sidewalks and narrow streets passing brick buildings lined with glass windows that let people gaze inside the shops. Parking is in underground decks, so streets should be mostly free of vehicles."
and
"While the place has all the signs of wealth, it also meets a goal of providing room for the working classes. Nearly 300 rental apartments and condos — one-fifth of all those built — were reserved for residents who earn the wages of office clerks, teachers and police officers. And the IKEA home furnishings store and Dillard's department store are filled with wallet-friendly items."
and
"The site paid about $300,000 a year in property taxes when it was a steel mill. This year, it will pay about $8 million, and payments are expected to reach up to $25 million a year in 2010. And those figures do not include new sales taxes to be generated by the retail district and hotel."
I liked this under the FAQ section of the Atl Stn Site:
Do I need a car at Atlantic Station? Only if you like having something to wash on the weekends. Everything you need will be within walking distance, from groceries, to work out facilities, to such a wide range of restaurants, that you'll never be bored with what’s for dinner. Need to get somewhere outside Atlantic Station? Just hop on our trolley and catch a ride to the MARTA Arts Center station.

Very Nice.
I wonder if Mitchell Schneider of First Interstate has some plans in store for expanding the SYC to include office space or residential units. I wonder if he even looked at Atlanta as a model - doesn't look like it.

World Town Planner Day

November 8, 2005, marks the 56th worldwide celebration of World Town Planning Day (WTPD), a special day to recognize how urban, rural, and regional planning help to create healthy and vibrant communities. On November 7, the student chapter of the American Planning Association at Cleveland State University will will hold an open house celebrating the planning achievements had by various organizations throughout the region in Glickman-Milller Hall at the Maxine Goodman-Levin College of Urban Affairs. The event will be held from 12:00 until 6:00 PM. The College of Urban Affairs is located on 1717 Euclid Avenue, Downtown Cleveland.

Come view plans from the City of Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, GCRTA, Ecocity Cleveland, Cleveland Public Art, HNTB, East Fourth Street Neighborhood and many others on Monday, November 7 from 12:00 to 6:00 PM in the Maxine Goodman-Levin College of Urban Affairs, located at 1717 Euclid Ave. in the atrium area. There will be a bake sale fundraiser on-site, with coffee and beverages available to purchase.

Founded in 1949 by the late Professor Carlos Maria della Paolera of the University of Buenos Aires, WTPD is currently celebrated in about 30 countries on four continents as a way to promote awareness and support for community planning. Within the United States, the American Planning Association (APA) and its professional institute, the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), sponsor celebrations to highlight how planning helps create communities of lasting value where people have better choices about how they work and live.

"World Town Planning Day is one day each year when the planning movement calls attention to the role of planning in making great communities throughout the world," said APA Executive Director Paul Farmer, AICP. "To help publicize the importance of planning across the country, APA members work in their communities, regions, and states to organize special activities and events."

APA and AICP have promoted excellence in the field of planning for more than 80 years. WTPD is one example of APA's commitment to promoting planning as a way for engaged citizens, along with civic leaders, business interests and other stakeholders, to play a meaningful role in creating communities that enrich people's lives.

"Believe in Cleveland" - or something like that

Be Leav’n Cleveland!

The more I think about this, the more I do not like it. I was intrigued when I first heard about it and I fell that there was good intention behind it – although conception and execution have lacked creativity.

Conception – The play on words are painfully obvious to me. It’s as bad as when we first heard about the Cavaliers new home – Gund Arena. You would think having an advertising company as a partner, there would have been more thought about this, or at least had some study groups respond… maybe they did – don’t know.

Execution – Where is it? It has been a little while now and I have barely seen or heard anything about it. I have a button, bumper sticker and t-shirt from the last Brain Gain event – I will probably use the t-shirt for a stocking stuffer for some poor soul. The pin in is on the wall of my cubicle at school and I am not sure what to do with the bumper sticker since my car is leased. This cannot be the extent of their plan, can it?

I admit, I saw one commercial on TV around one in the morning about two weeks ago. It wasn't that great. On the Believe page, the sponsors include about 11 radio stations. I listen to maybe six or seven of them depending on my mood and the time of day. I have never heard any of the ads listed. I have not seen anything in print, except for the Pd itself. There have been a few in there.

I think it they need to rethink this plan.

Atlanta just unveiled a new logo and slogan. From the Southern Voice:

On Monday, Mayor Shirley Franklin and city officials unveiled a new logo, the first part of a $4.5 million campaign designed to highlight what makes Atlanta stand out from other U.S. cities.

The logo contains the letters “ATL” inside a red and white swirling circle. The circle represents three themes selected to draw tourists and businesses to the city: opportunity, optimism and openness.

Probably won't win awards, but you can tell they put some thought (and money) into it. I wonder what Stern and the PD are spending on this program. (I also find it interesting that Stern is not putting there name in with the sponsors.)

I have an idea for a slogan. It is used, but it was good. Remember the slogan that used to be on our license plates – “The Heart of it All.” (news) I always liked that. That was way better then the current “Birthplace of Flight.” God that’s stupid. Is this how we want to be known by the rest of the region and state? Same thing with “Believe,” – I am not a marketer, but I feel there has to be a better way to do this. So consider this my official claim for the unused license plate slogan: “Cleveland – The Heart of it All!”

The Balloon has Popped

After all of the excitement regarding Cleveland being one of the most livable cities in the world, (I am sure everybody has seen all of the newspaper articles and television spots touting it, right?) it now appears that it has nothing to do with our cultural assets, as the Mayor has espoused recently in the PD.

CoolTown Studios tells us Richard Florida, the author of the 2002 best-seller The Rise of the Creative Class, has released his current list of the top 15 cities for creative types. It is in the current issue of Fast Company.

15 hot cities for creative types

Yesterday I re-introduced Richard Florida, and as promised, here's his most current list, as featured in the November issue of Fast Company, of the hottest cities for creative types like yourself.

In no particular order:

Sacramento, CA - WIne is big, the downtown is coming around, and outdoor recreation abounds.
Phoenix, AZ - Artists like its free spirit, biotech is booming downtown, and yes, few rainy days.
Salt Lake City, UT - Mormons are big on enterpreneurship, really big. Not so much on diversity though.
San Antonio, TX - It's affordable and culturally rich, but it's diversity isn't known for collaborating.
Raleigh-Durham, NC - Three major universities are a major reason why the creative class population is at nearly 40%.
San Diego, CA - The perfect weather, biotech explosion and burgeoning downtown are fast making this city perhaps too desirable as far as housing prices go.
Portland, OR - One of the country's best models for urban planning, and more microbreweries per capita than any other city.
Madison, WI - Progressive, biotech, incredible quality of life - perennial 'best place to live'.
Tucson, AZ - Tech company leaders are attracted in droves (fifth-fastest growing in high-tech) to its desert beauty, recreation and affordability, but the city is fighting sprawl.
Colorado Springs, CO - The military presence provides a steady supply of jobs, the mountain recreation keeps workers there.
Dublin, Ireland - (Pictured) Bono helped do for Dublin what REM did for Athens - it's the place to be.
Helsinki, Finland - Beautiful, tons of recreation, safe and a high-tech magnet.
Montreal, Quebec - The creative industry thrives here, with more set and sound-stage space than any North American city, in a historic European setting.
Sydney, Australia The 'San Francisco down under', whose population represents 180 countries, 140 languages, 300 biotech companies and 20 beaches.
Vancouver, BC The hollywood of the video game industry and often referred to as the most livable city in the world.

What are we going to do now? Maybe we should make our own list. How about “Top ten cities that wish they were Cleveland.” On the other hand, “Top Ten List that have/do not have Cleveland in them” sounds good too.